There are no items in your cart
Add More
Add More
Item Details | Price |
---|
Introduction
Every investor knows it’s risky to put all your eggs in one basket. That’s why asset allocation is considered the bedrock of smart investing. But what if the market is overheated or undervalued? Enter tactical allocation — a flexible approach to adapt and boost returns.
In this blog, we’ll break down the differences, show you when and how to use each, and walk through a real-world example of two friends who took different approaches — and got different outcomes.03/06/2025
Asset allocation is your long-term investment strategy — deciding what portion of your money goes into equity, debt, gold, or real estate based on your goals, age, and risk tolerance.
Example: A 30-year-old may have 70% in equity, 20% in debt, 10% in gold.Tactical allocation is dynamic investing — you tweak your asset mix based on market trends or short-term opportunities.
Example: If equity markets are overheated, you reduce equity to 50% and increase debt temporarily, then revert later. This method requires market knowledge, timing, and monitoring, but may offer higher returns if done well.
Real-Life Example: Karthik vs. Priya
Feature | Asset Allocation | Tactical Allocation |
---|---|---|
Objective | Long-term balance | Short-term opportunity |
Frequency of Change | Annual or fixed | Dynamic, as market changes |
Risk Level | Medium | Medium to High |
Effort Required | Low | High |
Conclusion
If you prefer stability and don’t track markets daily, asset allocation is your best friend. But if you’re market-savvy and confident in timing, tactical allocation can give your portfolio a boost — if used carefully.
Start by deciding your base asset allocation. Once confident, you can experiment with tactical tweaks — but only if you understand the risks.
Summary Table: Asset Allocation vs Tactical Allocation
Strategy | Avg. Return (5 Yr CAGR) | Avg. Risk (Volatility) | Avg. Investor Behaviour |
---|---|---|---|
Asset Allocation | 10–11.5% | Medium | Disciplined, consistent SIPs |
Tactical Allocation | 12–14% | Medium to High | Reactive, needs active monitoring |
No Strategy (Random) | 6–9% | High | Emotional exits, poor rebalancing |
Dr. Satish Vadapalli
Research Analyst